SAWN
Trending:
The Toll-road, what does it offer?
Amadu
Wurie Jalloh & Earnest Yusif Tarawalie
In the words of SARAH
SANDS (Evening Standard, Tuesday 8 March, 2016, p.15), “It is axiomatic that
people grumble about big public projects until they are successful and then all
oppositions is forgotten.” This I want to believe is the case with many
development strides of governments and its partners in Sierra Leone overtime
including the recently embarked on four-lane toll-road project. I admit things have
not been easy in Sierra Leone, especially since the last Ebola Outbreak and the
fall of iron ore and raw commodities in the global market, which twin shocks
devastated our economy, but yet we’ve seen progress and defied expatriates
forecasts on the magnitude effect it could cost us.
The
pivotal role good roads networking plays in promoting sustainable economic
growth and livelihood cannot be overemphasized. The country arguably has some
of the poorest road infrastructure in Sub-Sahara Africa, with vicious spoils of
the devastating 12year war still eminent. This project I believe will solve
lots of issues, some of which including: Road rage which is causing lots of
nuisance and menace, smooth inflow and outflow of commodities and people in and
out of Freetown to the provinces and neighbouring countries, congestion and road
accidents, tightening security monitoring activities for traffic and road
crimes with the cameras, tourism, fuel utilization cut as a result of reducing
time covered at a usually short but congestive distance, enhancement of
effective monitoring activities and service delivery for public services, and
finally this would help attract more investors in the country because of the
infrastructural improvement which could
be business friendly.
I
also believe this road project will help actualize the decentralization policy
and reduce population density in the capital in cases where business choose to
dodge the payment of the levied sum and decide to instead divert their market
base to other provincial headquarter towns.
Shebora Samaba Kamara
The
toll road project is in fact an ironic and a miscalculated government policy.
The country is in a state of “austerity measures” dubbed as economic/revenue
rationalization. It is therefore ironic that few months ago the government tell
us to cut-down spending and allow equilibrating a crippling economy, and now
the same government is rationalizing their blunder by asking us to pay huge
sums for maximum 25years to access the capital city, and, or its outskirt. Meanwhile
nationals, unlike other countries with similar projects, have not been given an
optional road in the event they cannot afford the levied amounts for a swifter transportation.
The
toll road will worsen inflation which to some extent is the cause for declaration
of a state of austerity. Sierra Leone is an import based economy; we greatly
rely on essential commodity imports from our neighbouring Guinea to replenish
our emasculate and centralized market, and Masiaka Highway is the only sure
gateway to these stock exchanges. Businesses mainly entrust their goods to
heavy-duty vehicles for transportation to ensure intactness and lesser expense,
and now their charges are almost doubled. This will inflate prices; deflate the
Leone’s value as against the $US Dollar and Guinean Franc; increase cost of
living and worsen livelihood; and most importantly the immediate shock will
render lots of businesses, especially indigenous industries incompetent and so
loosing market space. In essence, the Farmers who produce crops from the provinces
to supply in freetown will surely be faced with the constraints of transporting
such because most times heavy duty trucks are contracted to transport these
foods stuffs to freetown, the exorbitant prize tags for accessing the toll road
will only render us an economy that does not support local farmers and business
men as food items will have to perish and the people of freetown will have to
suffer the most.
Ibrahim
Mansaray & Saidu Mahmoud Bah
The
toll road is in direct opposition to Pillar 1 of the Agenda for Prosperity- Road to Middle Income Status which
deliberates on diversified economic growth with special reference to “removing
constraints to women’s participation in the economy” and strategies to enhancing
maximum agricultural production (GoSL 2013-2018). The initiation of this
project will worsen food insecurity in the country and lead to massive
unemployment among women and youths. National Food Poverty, according to the
Agenda for Prosperity (GoSL 2013-2018) as at 2011 is at 47.7% (51.8% in Rural,
and 40.8% in rural), which is among the highest in West Africa. Agriculture
contributes 40 to 50% of the GDP of the country. “Women account for
approximately 55% of agricultural production” and they are the mostly
vulnerable (GoSL, 2013-2018). The heavy charges on transportation for
agricultural harvest will discourage many farmers and divert the youths and
abled bodies to other income generating activities, as we have already in lots
of villages and towns. Freetown is by far the biggest market base for
agro-produce in the country reasons being our agricultural produce have not
been doing well both in catering for the population and in meeting standards at
the internal level.
This
project will trigger the insurgence of in-betweeners in the agricultural
economy and further worsen cost of production and food poverty and
malnutrition. Lots of farmers cannot afford hiring a truck to Freetown after a
bountiful produce in time to come, and this will trigger a revert to subsistent
agricultural practice, and disenfranchise women in the economic and social
sense. Livelihood and welfare will be affected greatly, and import will further
outweigh export level. And worse still people will risk taking their goods to
Freetown through canoes and other unsafe means of transportation by water that
could lead to loss of properties and endangerment to lives. Either way the
project will create a room for black marketers (profiteers) and artificial
price hiking for most indigenous produce; and indigenous industries will suffer
the most. I believe the best way to have opened up partnership in
infrastructural development with the Chinese was to have given them the chance
to recreate the railway system of transportation which is an effective means of
opening small towns and enhancing transportation of goods and services, and
tourism. A railway system would have make accessibility to agro-produces in
many interior parts in the country to Freetown and hence prompted investment in
agriculture. This would have helped made redundant lots of other unsafe
transportation means and redirect youths attention to agriculture and farming
to enhance both food security and diversified economic development.
No comments:
Post a Comment